Skip to content
Trend UK Media

The Iconic Puzzle Game Couldn't Win at The Game Awards — A New Category Might Solve This

As any major prize-giving event nears, there’s always a clamor for introducing fresh award types to recognize unsung work and satisfy the spirits of fans with niche passions.

A fellow writer previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. That would be fantastic. The same goes for board games, representing someone's personal cause. However, I must insist for pushing forward just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, I possess a compelling case for why my demand remains most pressing above others. This is the request: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and inevitably start arguments and end in fuzzy definitions. There’s a reason film award organizations avoid this approach. But it is an unavoidable compromise for the industry of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify one unified medium.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

The major gaming awards currently feature genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these six categories actually cover numerous genres, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: structural challenges of one title, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games published annually that have no home in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match award groups including Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • One classic puzzle game received no recognition completely in 2014
  • Another creative title missed out in 2019
  • Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment that year
  • Just some puzzle games barely qualified for niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

Frequently they represent small games, however the design behind logic titles carries substantial weight. Iconic mobile puzzle games stand as most popular titles globally continuing this trend for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game rivals popular creative games for the title of best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones for gaming as medium, while interacting with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate a field of five with fascinating, diverse, deserving games each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

And to reiterate, these represent titles that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Brain-teaser creators function at the challenging frontier of video game design, producing among essential manifestations within interactive entertainment. Comparable to film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait generations.

About the author

Robert Turner

A tech journalist and lifestyle blogger with a passion for uncovering emerging trends and sharing practical insights.

Trend UK Media

Type to search articles.